MorphBorgs

Former Morgborgs Blog

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:28:47 +0000

Blog to view now is the Morphborgs

M o r p h borgs rather than Morgborgs

However you can read other posts here:

http://morgborgs.blog.com/

Kate

Artificial blood cells trying to replace the real stuff!

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:08:57 +0000

I constantly look for new avenues to travel where I might run into a big truck carrying the answer to my
inquiries into Morgellons Disease, but, maybe I should
be looking for a gnat carrying the spark of life.

Below is the newly found matches Mr. Clifford
Carnicom has found in studying this unusual
fiber form, and the blood of Morgellon’s folks.
Below is the latest from the Carnicom Institute.

http://www.carnicom.com/blood2.htm

Also if you want to join the discussion visit:
http://morgboard.proboards.com/

Kate

Welcome again to my blog

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:54:13 +0000

Welcome all who wish to discuss the disease Morgellons which I call Morphborgs.

Here we can delve into the science of evolution and how it pertains to this disease, if at all.

My name is Kathryn Augustyn and this will be an open blog.

Please comment and feel free to contribute as well.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Augustyn

Evolution - Genetics - Molecules - Morphborgs

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:52:02 +0000

Has Evolutionary Theory been foisted upon us and Evolution itself;
a forced, directed adaptation to an environment, where horizontal/
lateral gene transcription has taken place? Where direct
alterations and manipulation of genes in many species, has created
evolutionary, morphed organisms called “novel organisms”,
the previous organisms die, and the new remain, in other words
transplantation of other genes normally not found in previous
species is now in the new novel organisms.

When new species arise, it is due to manipulated, rearranged genes
from other species, introduced by way of vectors other than
parasites themselves. Reprogramming nature would be a better
word.

Has “Classical population genetics” overlooked the environment?

In attempting to understand the morphborg (Morgellons), one has to
understand the morphology of Evolutionary theory, itself?

Morphology and evolution are not the same thing, but in today’s reality
they are linked with genome science which carried ‘a flawed theory”
and yet the top down approach to forcing adaptation seems to have won.

When genes are considered the base of disease, there is flawed science,
there is inferred science and conclusions are made that totally leave out
the fact that mutations happen because of something outside of the
gene, that unfolds the gene to permit viruses, chemicals or radiation
to enter in.

It is mutations that make the gene flawed. Not the gene itself.

There seems to have been an ulterior motive or reason for this belief
to continually go forward. Perfecting the gene? Or was the purpose
to change genes, to cause more mutations?

Mutations make more disease. Why are the reasons, the causes of these
diseases never examined? Only the gene is, when the cause is based
on viruses, bacteriophages, yeast gene manipulation, fungi, bacteria
and molds.

And that includes humans.

Below is a summary of this procession and clues as to how this all
came about, and how we basically can be profiled by our genes.

Darwin to DNA……Accepting the fact that from Darwin to the Genome,
evolution is made to happen, and now with the genome
genes can be altered, by way of pills, environment and food.

http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ppv/RPViewDoc?_handler_
=HandleInitialGet&journal=gen&volume=46&calyLang=fra&
articleFile=g03-118.pdf

"Morphology (biology)

The term morphology in biology refers to the outward appearance
(shape, structure, colour, pattern) of an organism taxon and its
component parts. This is in contrast to physiology, which deals
primarily with function. or

Also in use is the term “gross morphology”, which refers to the
prominent or principal aspects of an organism or taxon’s
morphology. A description of an organism’s gross morphology
would include, for example, its overall shape, overall colour,
main markings etc. but not finer details.

Most taxa differ morphologically from other taxa. Typically
closely related taxa differ much less than more distantly related
ones, but there are exceptions to this. Cryptic species are
species which look very similar, or perhaps even outwardly
identical, but are reproductively isolated. Conversely,
sometimes unrelated taxa acquire similar appearance through
convergent evolution or even through mimicry. A further
problem with relying on morphological data is that what may
appear, morphologically speaking, to be two distinct species,
may in fact be shown by DNA analysis to be a single species.”…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphology_%28biology%29

Evolution:

“In biology, evolution is a change in the inherited traits of a
population from one generation to the next. This process causes
populations of organisms to change over time. Inherited traits
are the expression of genes that are passed on to offspring
during reproduction. Mutations in genes can produce new or
altered traits, resulting in the appearance of heritable differences
between organisms. Such new traits also come from the transfer
of genes between populations, as in migration, or between
species, in horizontal gene transfer. Evolution occurs when
these heritable differences become more common or rare in a
population, either non-randomly through natural selection or
randomly through genetic drift.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Convergent evolution:

“In evolutionary biology, convergent evolution is the process
whereby organisms not closely related (not monophyletic),
independently evolve similar traits as a result of having to adapt
to similar environments or ecological niches^[1]. It is the
opposite of divergent evolution, where related species evolve
different traits. On a molecular level, this can happen due to
random mutation unrelated to adaptive changes; see long
branch attraction.”


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution

Kathryn (Skytroll)

What Did Darwin Do?

Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:54:35 +0000

The question begs an answer.  However, I believe many scientists laid the

groundwork for Darwin, he was able to take the concepts and run with them.

His observations where recorded quite diligently.  It was through these

observations and discoveries that he was able to form the Theory of Evolution.

But, was this theory to be used for the good of man?

 Some of Darwin's observations were noted quite well in his manuscripts.  The

ground work for the Evolutionary Tree of Life began with these notes.  When

Darwin wrote them he had many questions, very valid, indeed.  Many of his

works can be found here:

http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F339.1&viewtype=side&pageseq=1

It is Darwin's black box that may have the clues to the human sufferings many

humans are experiencing in this 21st Century.  The Morphborg, a creepy crawly

critter has invaded the homeland, Earth.  The plague, I call a bioengineered

plague because, there was a blueprint laid out, plans to follow and observations

made in nature that could be used for either enhanced betterment of mankind or

for an initiation of a paradigm establishing the lineage of the evolution of man.

Even Darwin said, unless an intermediary is present, evolution cannot be proven,

only inferred.   It can also be used as bioweapon.  Convergence today of bio-

logical, chemical, and physical elements are the continuation of this evolution

into a Transhumanist, surpassing the biological element that is human.

 The most revealing and the most devastating of this is when not only a lineage

is created, but the models to prove it, made in the lab, with the tools of

the genome, the proteomes, bacteriophages, nano organisms and devices.

When Darwin's follower and DNA synthetic creator, Craig  Venter, ,  sailed out on

his expedition, to observe and collect, from deep down in depths of the ocean

the goal was to find and observe more, to find what else can be used as interme-

diary between one species of life and another.  However, this was to cross

barriers never crossed before.  And now synthetic DNA is used right alongside

new discoveries in uses of nano bacterias, nanogases, nano carbonates, and

dark and light matter particles.

The goal here seems to be to recreate life, reform it, evolve it, not to enhance

the human species.  In this process, humans will suffer.  It is the endangerment

of the species, caused by the convergence of biological species, introduced

thermal bacterias from under the earth, chemical elements, the clay itself, and

the particles and atoms of nature, and one must not forget the electrical/

magnetic forces/light forces that can control the very atoms that we are made of.

But what did Darwin do?

To begin with, he set out to record the species prevalent in certain areas around

the world, sent on a Navy ship into the waters by her majesty, the queen of

England,  to tour islands, and continents and record his observations of any and

all species he encountered.  One of his biggest aims and the basis of all

observations was to find the origin and the evolutionary process in the creation

of man. However, included in this were the observations and  speculations of the

endangerment of a certain species of man.  The lineages of hereditary and the

mixing of human races was foremost on his mind, as it was in the minds of the

English Aristocracy.

Darwin's black box, is Pandora's Box, closed, but never locked.

This box is opened many times, and each time, the truth is apparant, begging

to be let out of the box.  It will not be opened for complete viewing until the

next evolution, or transhuman experience is fulfilled.

So, what is in the box?

To begin with, this book delves into Pandora's box, and we can see what has

transpired in the evolutionary process as described by Behe.

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution.....

http://www.amazon.com/Darwins-Black-Box-Biochemical-Challenge/dp/0684834936

Skytroll

The Origin of the MorphBorg

Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:29:42 +0000

Morphborgs began in someone’s imagination. It was a thought. Scientists began a long journey into Uniformitarianism and evolution. Uniformitarianism “Is a theory that rejects the idea that catastrophic forces were responsible for the current conditions on the Earth. The theory suggested instead, that continuing uniformity of existing processes were responsible for the present and past conditions of this planet.”(1)

This concept developed in the late 1700s, suggests that catastrophic processes were not responsible for the landforms that existed on the Earth’s surface. This idea was diametrically opposed to the ideas of that time period which were based on a biblical interpretation of the history of the Earth. Instead, the theory of uniformitarianism suggested that the landscape developed over long periods of time through a variety of slow geologic and geomorphic processes.

The term uniformitarianism was first used in 1832 by William Whewell, a University of Cambridge scholar, to present an alternative explanation for the origin of the Earth. The prevailing view at that time was that the Earth was created through supernatural means and had been affected by a series of catastrophic events such as the biblical Flood. This theory is called catastrophism.

The ideas behind uniformitarianism originated with the work of Scottish geologist James Hutton. In 1785, Hutton presented at the meetings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh that the Earth had a long history and that this history could be interpreted in terms of processes currently observed. For example, he suggested that deep soil profiles were formed by the weathering of bedrock over thousands of years. He also suggested that supernatural theories were not needed to explain the geologic history of the Earth.

Figure 10c-1: James Hutton, 1726-1797.

Hutton’s ideas did not gain major support of the scientific community until the work of Sir Charles Lyell. In the three volume publication Principles of Geology (1830-1833), Lyell presented a variety of geologic evidence from England, France, Italy, and Spain to prove Hutton’s ideas correct and to reject the theory of catastrophism.

Figure 10c-2: Sir Charles Lyell, 1797-1875.

The theory of uniformitarianism was also important in shaping the development of ideas in other disciplines. The work of Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace on the origin of the Earth’s species extended the ideas of uniformitarianism into the biological sciences. The theory of evolution is based on the principle that the diversity seen in the Earth’s species can be explained by the uniform modification of genetic traits over long periods of time.

Thus, uniformitarianism suggests that the continuing uniformity of existing processes should be used as the framework for understanding the geomorphic and geologic history of the Earth. Today, most theories of landscape evolution use the concept of uniformitarianism to describe how the various landforms of the Earth came to be. (1)

So, by enforcing a theory, although not proven, a “forced” type of Evolution, often called “Directed” Evolution began. By way of strong peer review in subjective manner only, the objective examination of geological structures was left under the mountain. However, this was still theory. Some things can be proven, but evolution is impossible to prove.   The word to use, possibly, could be devolution, however, this too was created by the process of forced evolution. Evolutionists, basically kidnapped nature and made a new Tree of Life, and incorporated all of the new “novel organisms” created in a lab into it.   Cladistics was the name of the new form of taxonomy, which would include those produced by genetic engineers.

To understand diseases today called syndromes, one has to find what was modified in the environment to produce a wide-ranging effect of genetic alteration in humans, animals, insects, and the envrionment. Many of the diseases today are caused by proteins unfolding and accepting other proteins from genetically modified proteins in foods. This has changed the flow of normal proteins to include the genetically altered proteins which cannot be broken down in the human body.   The body has to adjust or adapt to a new form of food protein. Often the very effect of devolution takes place setting the stage for a species to die. Forced or programmed evolution can make this happen. Species only become endangered if threatened by other species. Nothing evolves, but something dies.

So, an opposite effect takes place. If new species are introduced into geological areas, of which they do not belong, then the old species will die off, as the newer stronger species come in, and adapt to that new environment. Same with genetically engineered food proteins in the human body. What is happening now with genetically altered food crops, is that not just one item is altered, many are, and yet the body is supposed to adapt or die? When forced evolution is made to happen on certain species, including humans, something will die. What is it? The old genes, the old proteins or the whole organism?

The theory of evolution was and is being used as a reverse of itself. For something to evolve it has to pass from one species to another. Even Darwin admitted that cannot happen unless an intermediary is present.   That intermediary can be an inorganic substance, a metal, a mineral, a gas, an enzyme, a peptide, synthetic DNA, a prion, or a nano device. The novel organisms are new species introduced, nothing has passed from one organism to another, only a substitute to push out the existing organisms. Genes do not jump species. Prions are a way for proteins to be instituted into the unfolding of animal or human proteins. When this happens, the surrounding proteins unfold in other ways, so a cascading effect takes place. When unfolded, mutations into the genes happen. These mutations then cause the environment of the body to alter and change/adapt or die.

Evolution appears to endanger species, rather than evolve them.   An introduced species has to come before the evolution of a species into a higher order. The scheme of lineage can only hold true if the models used can be inserted as the intermediaries between the old species and the new. But, when crossing disciplines, like biology, chemistry, and physics, one is crossing a convergence point between what is natural and unnatural, therefore, evolution is really not a natural process, as we evolve into transhuman beings. There is nothing natural about it when synthetic Morphborgs are being created to symbiot with the human, that is all that is happening and it is making people sick.

So, uniformatarianism and evolution walk hand in hand, to make DNA part of everything.  Proteins from the sea shell or the diatom algae become part of the the human DNA.   The nano device builds and grows inside the human gut, as if it were 200 ft down in the ocean bottom. We become symbiont with the minerals of the earth, the flora of the fields and the bug in our belly.

Citations: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10c.html

Just what did Darwin Do?…….next issue………

Skytroll

Are we turning to Stone? Have Diatoms evolved recently into new creations?

Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:18:55 +0000

Calcium seems to have evolved into Human Beings causing a wide

assortment of problems, such as:

       Heart attacks from calcium in the arteries.

       Kidney disease from calcium in the bladder or kidneys.

       Kidney stones in ducts.

       Skin diseases from calcium deposits on the skin.

       Liver disease from calcium in the bile ducts, the liver and

                gall bladder.

       Arthritis from calcium in the joints.

       AlS from sclerosing,  calcium in the peripheral muscles,

               nerves and blood.

       Cystic fibrosis, is this calcium cysts in the lungs?

     It does appear that calcium could be the cause of many and maybe

all illnesses.  Why would calcium be so prevalent in our bodies?   It

is in many food items, even sodas.  Are we evolving?  Is there a

program making that happen?  Is our DNA changing?  Are Humans

being reprogrammed?  Is our DNA code taking on a new meaning in

evolution? Or was this an indicative event in planned Evolution # 1?

     Here are some thoughts from some who examine evolution and its

explanation of phenetics.  Phenotypes are a type of organism model,

like a prototype for a new car.

............................

"Phenetics holds that we can not know evolutionary history with certainty.

Therefore, the best measure of relatedness is overall similarity, based on as

many characters as possible.  It attempts to avoid subjective character

weighting. However, this approach admits three types of information into a

scheme which inaccurately reflect evolutionary history. The first is homoplasious

characters; those which arose independently in two groups, and do not reflect

inheritance from a common ancestor. Such parallel or convergent characters are

analogous rather than homologous, and do not reflect genealogical relationship.

The second regards evolutionary rate. A taxon which diverges rapidly will have

less overall similarity to those which it is actually closely related/derived, and

thus will be classified separately. Third, overall similarity may be misleading,

because some characters are derived evolutionary novelties (synapomorphy,

below), and shared by a more immediately related group and others are primitive

retentions or ancestral characters (symplesiomorphy, below) and tell us nothing

about close evolutionary relationships. For example, the presence of

chlorophyll-a tells us nothing about the relationship between diatoms and

chrysophyte flagellates, because chlorophyll-a is a character of all photo-

autotrophs (for further phycological examples see Kociolek et al. 1989, Gallagher

1989). The resulting classification depicts overall phenotypic similarity rather

than evolutionary relationships.  Thus, it defines groups of organisms which

do not participate in biological processes per se (Mishler 1986)."...

....."Phylogenetic Systematics uses the principles of set theory to reconstruct

hypotheses of evolutionary relationships: the phylogeny of a group of organisms.

It avoids characters indicative of distant, ancient relationship (symplesiomorphies),

for example the presence of chlorophyll-a among photo-autotrophs, as well as

false indicators of geneological relationship  (i.e. parallelisms and convergences,

or homoplasies), using instead homologous characters as indicators of evolution.

It therefore requires careful investigation of homology . It is recognized that

homologous characters are of two kinds: relatively derived or advanced

(synapomorphies), indicative of close relationship, and relatively ancestral or

primitive (symplesiomorphies), indicative of distant older, more general

relationships. A hierarchical scheme is constructed on the basis of shared

characters that are derived or synapomorphic for that level of the hierarchy.

Each apomorphous character is synapomorphic at some level in the heirarchy,

and is used in the analysis to resolve the relationship at that level. It can be

seen that the terms primitive (pleisiomorphic) and advanced (apomorphic) are

relative, dependent on the level in the hierarchy from which they are viewed. "

......

 cited from:

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:b_1OuaI6734J:thalassa.gso.uri.edu/

rines/systmtcs/chapter1.htm+Darwin+and+study+of+diatoms&hl=en&gl=us&strip=0

      In "derived evolutinary novelties", or in todays evoluted think, one calls it

evolutionary development  (Evo Devo) which tells us that evolution can be

developed, or that a model and/or evolutionary development is taking place,

or has taken place or is about to take place.  Sickness today, I believe is caused

by this Evolutionary Development Scheme from "derived evolutionary novelties"

or "novel organisms" which are called new discoveries, and which Darwin called

"new creations found".  Either way, they have been created and put in the wild

or in some cases domestic animals, like cows, pigs, chickens, and sheep. A

disease like Morgellons could possibly begin by an Evolutionary process applied

today in what I shall call "Forced Evolution".

     the above article from the above link concludes with this:

"A gardener can have profound knowledge of ornamental plants, yet be unable

to create a meaningful garden. For no matter how beautiful or interesting each

individual plant, their relationship to each other is defined by a higher order of

structure, an architectural framework. Likewise, study of the interwoven life

histories, ecological roles and vagariesof distribution of diatoms will draw

strength from a rigorous framework, the theoretical architecture giving shape to

the gardens of the sea."

Skytroll

to be continued in next article..................

The People are Hurting

Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:18:23 +0000

I listen to the news today, and hear the clear division in our Congress, I hear one side blaming the other, and the other blaming the other, and so on. The people are hurting. Congress and this administration do not speak for the people any longer. Only we can change that. We, the people, must not falter, we may go down with the ship, but, the ship is ours. So, are we going to stand for what is ours?

Instead of “Mr. Gorbo….tear down this wall!” How about “Mr. Bush, “tear down this wall!”

FDR, “……the government is ourselves”………

Reagan, “….. Our constitution is such that WE, The People tell the government what they shall do” paraphrased.

How about WE, The People stand together for Humanitarian Americanism, NHA, Natural Human Americans.

Seems the AMA, the NIH, the CDC, and best among us have made greed and Nobel prizes, not noble prizes and it is part of the New Medical Oath and contribution to Science and Medicine: of saving the best and discarding the rest.

So, us Morgellons sufferers have the best among us, calling for the best of you intellectual slobs, out there, who do not know manure from gas, or cannot or will not look deep into the hearts and even the eyes and see the parasites crawling out, you cannot see the deformed faces, you cannot see the pits, and the scars, and pay no heed to the open lesions, to the fibers floating off from us, to the pain in our faces, to crying children who cannot sleep because the itching is inside and the crawling is constant. Tell me this you intellectual slobs, what is your main objective in life?

Glorified Slackers, former Hippies, former preppies, former yuppies, and now the new Singularians, the new Transhumans? The perfect genes, the perfect thought!

What are your goals? You have none, you are bored people, who have to exploit anything and everything in your image. You do not even know how to mow the grass, I betcha. You do not know how to make bread, or to clean out your pool, you have servants do that. You are not human, I think. So, if you have this higher intelligence, are you among those from another world? Well, now we are talking.

So, let’s talk!

Speak up, because we know you are bluffing! Another dot.com scheme.

Well, Morgies, hang on to your Morphborgs, this is proof that they have landed! This is proof that we have much to learn, that we have much to challenge the CDC, the NIH, the CIA, the slave companies who are falling for the legos and that our doctors, cannot or will not look at this scourge we have, because their worlds would come down, their preconceived worlds made of straw would burn.

I am angry that I have to live through this, that I have to suffer, and my best is buried, because this scourge eats me up, it challenges the very nerves that help me move, help me achieve, help me be human, but, yet, we are experiments, we are the cast offs, we are the forgotten, we are the condemned, we are to shut up, and endure.

No……………..NO………………………NO………………………We will continue to be the thorn in the side of you folks who think you have the power of thought, the power of the mind, and that you have to use a machine to make it so.

Once, nature was programmed in as far a stage as it could be, then the machine came in. Now, to make us the machine or to make the machine us, is the challenge is it not?

The final, to take over thought, rhetoric does not work so well, because it is starting to backfire. People are seeing through the veil.

Example, caught the EPA saying that the human pathagen part of the nine part plan to clean up the environment was one of the two not done, it will take 18 months to analyze pathogens……….. But…..but……the pollution……..the Global warming………the ice is melting………the chemtrails are saving the planet……..the buckyballs are the answer, the bucky tubes, the nanotubes, the nanobots, the very essence of life the very altering of the planet to form that new world, that new world that will only house how many?

SHOULD NOT HUMAN PATHOGENS HAVE BEEN FIRST ON THE LIST?

No consequences for thoughts for ideas that are starting to backfire! For the UN Agenda 21? For the secret Energy plans involving the EPA Genoming Synthetic projects?

To say that life can be made synthetic, can be made artificial, can be nothing more than DNA to be used at will.

Is nothing Sacred?

I hope this bites you Intellects in the arse, many times over and it takes chunks out and leaves lesions as big as craters in your arses! And I hope all the fibers in the general vacinity of your abodes find their way into those lesions and begin to build that new human you so desire to see.

Skytroll

Still Morphing Around

Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:21:30 +0000

Hello,

Here we are still Morphing around with our little MorphBorgs. These Morgellon critters sure keep busy, don’t they?

Well, so are we. Some information does exist on this MorphBorg that has incorporated into our skin, lungs, guts, and brain, but, nevertheless, there are some out there willing to take a risk and declare a hypothesis from observations gathered so far.

Many cannot or will not venture past the known parasites because those too are ignored here in America. That is so sad, because many people suffer from parasites, but, that is a dirty word so it is buried in the denial systems of most medical personnel. It does not exist here, even though many are bringing many new types of diseases to this country with no safeguards for the citizens already here. There seems to be “a failure to communicate” those things that animals can get but humans cannot. Parasites are not infections. Parasites are symbiotic organisms that have a goal in mind. They go where the food is. The ramble around in human bodies, pet’s bodies, insects and many parasitologists here in America think these only exist in animals not in humans. Do they know anything about parasites? Why are they not onto this parasite that is afflicting many in America?

Somehow, this cannot be identified? why is that?

Maybe, because it was created. Maybe, because it is the NEXT evolution so planned by those who think life can be stored in libraries, and then when the operations are over, sustainability has engrained itself into the population that has planned this all along, and many followers just followed, never asking what was going on. When the operations in the atmosphere are over, then the next step will be implemented.

Evolution is about perfecting the environment and all the organisms in it. The best place to start is where it cannot be traced, for a while anyway. The smallest spark of life, the smallest lego of life. When things can be made from nothing, at that zero point between magnetic and electrical fields, where the top of the pyramid will be revealed, is in the making now.

So, what happens then?

Do we evolve into more perfect beings, are the perfect plants, animals, insects, been perfected to the utmost possible programmed entity? That is what evolution is about, that is what genoming is about, save the perfected species, discard the rest. And nano sure can get to the smallest point.

Here is a reminder that research is being done, has been documented and is the only research with any validity concerning the Morgellons Syndrome. I would say if there are researchers out there, studying this, and not, that so far this is the only theory that has some proof. I too say, prove this is something other than nano created devices.

http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=180629

Skytroll

IS ZERO-POINT GRAVITY BEING TESTED ON HUMANS NOW?

Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:40:05 +0000

To My fellow Magnets, Nano powered beings, and pre-Singularity Troopers,

After having many shocks while performing my job as a mere messenger of the slanted news, I received numerous shocks from metal doors. This has gone on for over a month, now. Well, I feel like Pavlov’s dog, and it is not a nice feeling. I feel I could plug myself in and probably turn on the light. Well I am plugged and the brain still works, so, I will present here what could be possibly free energy. And I got the shock-power to prove it!

We wonder about the nano material being produced, and when the full implementation of this zero point gravity is put into full gear, we will be in for a surprise, however, how is this being tested? Well, right under and over our noses, in and around our bodies, in and around the environment, above and below. So, just a bit of sparking going on, shouldn’t hurt us, right?

Please educate yourself as fast as you can. You may be able to see the picture.

Starting with Nano particles:

…”Researchers say they have successfully generated electricity from heat by trapping organic molecules between metal nanoparticles, a finding that could yield cheap refrigerators, not to mention new, more efficient energy sources in general.

Currently, about 90 percent of the world’s electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels, which creates heat, often in the form of steam. The steam spins a turbine that drives a generator to produce electricity.

But this method is indirect, and in the process, plenty of heat is wasted and its energy goes uncaptured.

“Generating 1 watt of power requires about 3 watts of heat input and involves dumping into the environment the equivalent of about 2 watts of power in the form of heat,” said lead author Arun Majumdar of the University of California at Berkeley. […]

……..

The US military is considering testing the principle behind a type of space drive which holds the promise of reaching Mars in just three hours. The problem is, as New Scientist explains, it’s entirely theoretical and many physicists admit they don’t understand the science behind it.

Nonetheless, the so-called “hyperdrive” concept won last year’s American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics award for the best nuclear and future flight paper. Among its defenders is aerospace engineer Pavlos Mikellides, from the Arizona State University in Tempe. Mikellides, who reviewed the winning paper, said: “Even though such features have been explored before, this particular approach is quite unique.”
[more]

………………….

Phonon Maser:

Gravitational devices, such as Casimir Mirrors, are limited in use to a few applications, such as MRI machines. However, today’s gravitational devices (including the first-ever patented “antigravity” device, US Patent No. 6,960,975) are too weak for many potentially lucrative and important applications. The Antigravity Maser (being patented in the US as the Phonon Maser) represents a true technological revolution.

The Phonon Maser overcomes the weakness inherent in all other gravitational devices by amplifying gravity (or antigravity) billions of times. It does this by means of a technology similar to one already in use for optical lasers. more, [Complete Page]

……………………………

UCLA engineers set new world record in generation of high-frequency submillimeter waves
Discovery paves the way for a new generation of sensing and imaging devices
Researchers at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science have achieved a new world record in high-frequency submillimeter waves. The record-setting 324-gigahertz frequency was accomplished using a voltage-controlled oscillator in a 90-nanometer complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) integrated circuit, a technology used in chips such as microprocessors.

The signal generator, which produces frequencies nearly 70 percent faster than other CMOS oscillators, paves the way for a new generation of submillimeter devices that could someday be used in high-resolution sensors on spacecraft, and here on Earth in a new class of highly integrated and lightweight imagers that could literally cut through fog and see through clothing fabrics. And because frequency ultimately means bandwidth, “the higher frequency increases the available bandwidth,” said M.C. Frank Chang, UCLA professor of electrical engineering, who leads the research team. That greater bandwidth translates into faster communication speeds.

With traditional 90-nanometer CMOS circuit approaches, it is virtually impossible to generate usable submillimeter signals with a frequency higher than about 190 GHz. That’s because conventional oscillator circuits are nonlinear systems in which increases in frequency are accompanied by a corresponding loss in gain or efficiency and an increase in noise, making them unsuitable for practical applications. […]

Much more and timetables…….Climb all over this website:

http://www.gravityphysics.com/tag/quantum/

Zero Point Energy:…………

Welcome to ZPEnergy - The Energy of The Future

This is a NEWS PORTAL dedicated to experimental research on REVOLUTIONARY ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES. We propose to you to use this site as THE concentrator of choice for valuable news on the fascinating but still controversial subject of over-unity (O/U) fuel-less energetics (devices tapping the Zero Point Energy (ZPE)/ Vacuum/ Cosmic/ Ambient energy fields) and related. We want to let the general public know that this is an active field and good progress is made towards validating this technology and bringing the first commercial operational device to the market.