Former Morgborgs Blog
Blog to view now is the Morphborgs
M o r p h borgs rather than Morgborgs
However you can read other posts here:
http://morgborgs.blog.com/
Kate
This concept developed in the late 1700s, suggests that catastrophic processes were not responsible for the landforms that existed on the Earth’s surface. This idea was diametrically opposed to the ideas of that time period which were based on a biblical interpretation of the history of the Earth. Instead, the theory of uniformitarianism suggested that the landscape developed over long periods of time through a variety of slow geologic and geomorphic processes.
The term uniformitarianism was first used in 1832 by William Whewell, a University of Cambridge scholar, to present an alternative explanation for the origin of the Earth. The prevailing view at that time was that the Earth was created through supernatural means and had been affected by a series of catastrophic events such as the biblical Flood. This theory is called catastrophism.
The ideas behind uniformitarianism originated with the work of Scottish geologist James Hutton. In 1785, Hutton presented at the meetings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh that the Earth had a long history and that this history could be interpreted in terms of processes currently observed. For example, he suggested that deep soil profiles were formed by the weathering of bedrock over thousands of years. He also suggested that supernatural theories were not needed to explain the geologic history of the Earth.
Figure 10c-1: James Hutton, 1726-1797.
Hutton’s ideas did not gain major support of the scientific community until the work of Sir Charles Lyell. In the three volume publication Principles of Geology (1830-1833), Lyell presented a variety of geologic evidence from England, France, Italy, and Spain to prove Hutton’s ideas correct and to reject the theory of catastrophism.
Figure 10c-2: Sir Charles Lyell, 1797-1875.
The theory of uniformitarianism was also important in shaping the development of ideas in other disciplines. The work of Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace on the origin of the Earth’s species extended the ideas of uniformitarianism into the biological sciences. The theory of evolution is based on the principle that the diversity seen in the Earth’s species can be explained by the uniform modification of genetic traits over long periods of time.
Thus, uniformitarianism suggests that the continuing uniformity of existing processes should be used as the framework for understanding the geomorphic and geologic history of the Earth. Today, most theories of landscape evolution use the concept of uniformitarianism to describe how the various landforms of the Earth came to be. (1)
So, by enforcing a theory, although not proven, a “forced” type of Evolution, often called “Directed” Evolution began. By way of strong peer review in subjective manner only, the objective examination of geological structures was left under the mountain. However, this was still theory. Some things can be proven, but evolution is impossible to prove. The word to use, possibly, could be devolution, however, this too was created by the process of forced evolution. Evolutionists, basically kidnapped nature and made a new Tree of Life, and incorporated all of the new “novel organisms” created in a lab into it. Cladistics was the name of the new form of taxonomy, which would include those produced by genetic engineers.
To understand diseases today called syndromes, one has to find what was modified in the environment to produce a wide-ranging effect of genetic alteration in humans, animals, insects, and the envrionment. Many of the diseases today are caused by proteins unfolding and accepting other proteins from genetically modified proteins in foods. This has changed the flow of normal proteins to include the genetically altered proteins which cannot be broken down in the human body. The body has to adjust or adapt to a new form of food protein. Often the very effect of devolution takes place setting the stage for a species to die. Forced or programmed evolution can make this happen. Species only become endangered if threatened by other species. Nothing evolves, but something dies.
So, an opposite effect takes place. If new species are introduced into geological areas, of which they do not belong, then the old species will die off, as the newer stronger species come in, and adapt to that new environment. Same with genetically engineered food proteins in the human body. What is happening now with genetically altered food crops, is that not just one item is altered, many are, and yet the body is supposed to adapt or die? When forced evolution is made to happen on certain species, including humans, something will die. What is it? The old genes, the old proteins or the whole organism?
The theory of evolution was and is being used as a reverse of itself. For something to evolve it has to pass from one species to another. Even Darwin admitted that cannot happen unless an intermediary is present. That intermediary can be an inorganic substance, a metal, a mineral, a gas, an enzyme, a peptide, synthetic DNA, a prion, or a nano device. The novel organisms are new species introduced, nothing has passed from one organism to another, only a substitute to push out the existing organisms. Genes do not jump species. Prions are a way for proteins to be instituted into the unfolding of animal or human proteins. When this happens, the surrounding proteins unfold in other ways, so a cascading effect takes place. When unfolded, mutations into the genes happen. These mutations then cause the environment of the body to alter and change/adapt or die.
Evolution appears to endanger species, rather than evolve them. An introduced species has to come before the evolution of a species into a higher order. The scheme of lineage can only hold true if the models used can be inserted as the intermediaries between the old species and the new. But, when crossing disciplines, like biology, chemistry, and physics, one is crossing a convergence point between what is natural and unnatural, therefore, evolution is really not a natural process, as we evolve into transhuman beings. There is nothing natural about it when synthetic Morphborgs are being created to symbiot with the human, that is all that is happening and it is making people sick.
So, uniformatarianism and evolution walk hand in hand, to make DNA part of everything. Proteins from the sea shell or the diatom algae become part of the the human DNA. The nano device builds and grows inside the human gut, as if it were 200 ft down in the ocean bottom. We become symbiont with the minerals of the earth, the flora of the fields and the bug in our belly.
Citations: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10c.html
Just what did Darwin Do?…….next issue………
Skytroll
